Insights

Nature, risk and the financial architecture of resilience

Nature finance starts with ecology, but it quickly becomes a question of economics, risk and financial architecture.

These essays explore how functioning natural systems create economic value, how degradation transmits into financial loss, and what has to happen before that value can support dependable cashflows and institutional investment.

For readers new to the work, Start here follows one route through the argument, from ecological function and physical risk through valuation, attribution, contracting, aggregation, underwriting and pricing, to market architecture.

Start here

One route through the argument

This sequence follows how the argument developed, not the order the essays were published. Each piece builds on the one before.

  1. Function
  2. Risk
  3. System failure
  4. Valuation
  5. Cashflow
  6. Geography
  7. Attribution
  8. Contract
  9. Performance
  10. Aggregation
  11. Underwriting & pricing
  12. Market architecture
  1. Function

    Under pressure, pushing prices up, empty shelves

    Ecosystem services are productive infrastructure, and when they degrade the costs often land far from where the damage happened.

    26 Jan 2026 · Water & food systems

    Read article
  2. Risk

    The storm approaching – nature as infrastructure

    Nature as protective infrastructure that can reduce physical and financial loss.

    16 Mar 2026 · Nature as infrastructure

    Read article
  3. System failure

    Stock damage vs flow failure

    Why the failure of ecosystem-service flows can matter more than physical damage to an asset.

    12 Oct 2026 · Risk & resilience

    Read article
  4. Valuation

    Ain’t no mountain high enough, ain’t no discount rate low enough

    Why conventional valuation struggles with long-lived ecological systems that cannot simply be replaced.

    4 May 2026 · Valuation & investment

    Read article
  5. Cashflow

    Why nature finance keeps stalling at credit, and what to do about it

    Ecological value, financial value and investable cashflow are different things, and the gap between them is where deals stall.

    18 May 2026 · Markets & contracts

    Read article
  6. Geography

    The catchment doesn’t average

    Financial analysis has to follow the physical geography of how catchments and landscapes work.

    15 Jun 2026 · Water & food systems

    Read article
  7. Attribution

    Critical natural assets in the UK & Ireland - a map is not a market

    Mapping critical natural assets is not the same as finding the beneficiaries who might pay for them.

    29 Jun 2026 · Markets & contracts

    Read article
  8. Contract

    The contracting decade?

    The financial architecture needed to turn ecosystem-service benefits into durable claims and revenue.

    13 Jul 2026 · Markets & contracts

    Read article
  9. Performance

    The missing contract

    Paying providers for the services and performance they can deliver, rather than for outcomes they cannot control.

    19 Oct 2026 · Markets & contracts

    Read article
  10. Aggregation

    Standardise the wrapper, not the ecology

    How varied ecological projects can become legible to institutional investors without pretending the ecology is interchangeable.

    14 Sep 2026 · Valuation & investment

    Read article
  11. Underwriting & pricing

    The missing forward curve

    Why resilience needs forward-looking physical-risk information before it can be priced and underwritten.

    31 Aug 2026 · Risk & resilience

    Read article
  12. Market architecture

    Who owns the challenge? The market is growing, but what exactly are we financing?

    Nature finance may finally be scaling. The harder question is whether we are financing nature’s assets, or the functions those assets actually perform.

    9 Nov 2026 · Markets & contracts

    Read article

Latest insights

Recent writing

  1. Who owns the challenge? The market is growing, but what exactly are we financing?

    Nature finance may finally be scaling. The harder question is whether we are financing nature’s assets, or the functions those assets actually perform.

    Markets & contracts

    Read article
  2. How to live on Earth: perhaps the problem isn’t that nature has no price

    Financing nature is not the same as financialising it. The asset worth financing is the functioning system, not a pile of separable services.

    Nature as infrastructure

    Read article
  3. Music to my ears – what I heard at COP17

    What I heard at COP17: nature increasingly described as water infrastructure, across the programme.

    Nature as infrastructure

    Read article
  4. COP17: maybe the nature finance gap isn’t really a finance gap?

    From COP17 in Yerevan: perhaps the nature finance gap is less about money than about what we contract for.

    Markets & contracts

    Read article
  5. Who should underwrite the river?

    We can contract for actions on a river, but who carries the risk that the outcomes don’t arrive?

    Risk & resilience

    Read article
  6. When capital is scarce, nature infrastructure becomes more valuable

    As water companies struggle for capital, nature infrastructure that defers or avoids capex becomes more valuable.

    Valuation & investment

    Read article

All 61 essays in the archive

Explore by theme

Speaking

Talks and panels

  1. Nature finance in the UK: perspectives from investment leaders

    A conversation with two large institutional investors about nature finance in the UK.

    Moderator: Eoin Murray

    Nature Finance UK Conference 2026

  2. Building investable natural capital markets for marine nature

    Panel on what it will take to build investable markets for marine nature.

    Moderator: Eoin Murray

    Blue Finance 2026

  3. Saltmarsh finance workshop

    Leading the project-preparation and investability table at a workshop on financing saltmarsh restoration, with Athena Blue.

    Table lead: Eoin Murray

    Blue Finance 2026

  4. A deep dive on natural capital

    Panel discussion on natural capital as an investment theme.

    Panellist: Eoin Murray

    London Impact Investing Network (LIIN) · Imperial Business School, London

  5. Investing in Nature: building a sustainable market

    Panel discussion on what it will take to build a lasting market for private investment in nature.

    Panellist: Eoin Murray

    Office for Investment · M Shed, Bristol

  6. Turning nature-positive ambition into investable opportunities

    Panel at the UK–Armenia Nature Finance and Business Dialogue, held during CBD COP17.

    Panellist: Eoin Murray

    UK–Armenia Nature Finance and Business Dialogue · Yerevan, Armenia

  7. Business and Biodiversity Forum, closing panel

    Closing panel of Business Day at the UN biodiversity conference.

    Panellist: Eoin Murray

    CBD COP17 · Yerevan, Armenia

  8. Nature restoration finance

    The UK private-sector investment case for nature, the barriers to scale, and lessons from New Zealand.

    Panellist: Eoin Murray

    Biodiversity Law and Governance Day · Hogan Lovells · Online

  9. The $200 billion question: implementing the GBF’s ambition through practical investor steps

    Panel on the practical steps investors can take to deliver the Global Biodiversity Framework’s ambition, held during CBD COP17.

    Panellist: Eoin Murray

    IIGCC · Yerevan, Armenia

Explainers

The ideas behind our work, in one picture each.

Network map showing climate change at the centre, linked to hazards such as extreme heat, drought, floods and sea-level rise, which cascade into environmental, economic, infrastructure, social and institutional risks, with feedback loops for ecosystems, infrastructure, poverty and institutions.
Illustrative map of risk pathways. Adapted from Antonio Vizcaya Abdo; network approach inspired by the UN Global Risk Report 2026. Open full size
A seesaw diagram of leverage points for changing a system, rising from practical changes (measurable things, resource flows, feedback loops) through structural changes (new feedback loops, rules, democratising innovation) to cultural changes (purpose and public mindset), which offer stronger leverage but are harder to implement.
Donella Meadows’ leverage points, adapted from Commonland. Open full size